Correct
In a report published in November 2006, the
ERASAGE consortium
conducted an international review of various ethical, legal, social (ELS) research programs equivalent
to GE
3LS among various European countries, Canada and Israel. The report compares similarities and
differences in approaches and themes adopted to study the relationship between genomics and society.
Overall, the Report concludes that, comparatively speaking, Canada, together with the UK and
the Netherlands, has a
strongly developed GE
3LS program and in fact, Canada is particularly
highlighted as the "benchmark country".
See Conclusions at pages 29-30 of the Report,
available online.
Moreover, a
bibliometric study commissioned by Genome Canada and completed in December 2008 concluded that Canada is
well positioned in terms of its GE
3LS research publications, ranking fourth in the
world from 1996-2007, just behind the U.S., U.K. and Denmark, and on par with Australia
using a multi-criteria rating. Although numbers of GE
3LS related publications and citations alone
cannot provide any meaningful measure of GE
3LS research achievements, which are far
more complex to describe, they do nonetheless provide one concrete indicator.
More recently, an
External Evaluation of Genome Canada conducted by KPMG in May 2009 found that Canada’s leadership in GE
3LS research had improved substantially since Genome Canada was created, from an average rating of "fair to good" prior to Genome Canada, to an average rating of "excellent" now. In respect of integrated GE
3LS research, the evaluation revealed that 47% of respondents believed Canada has done this well or very well. Much of this enthusiasm can be attributed particularly to the international respondents who regarded Canada’s experience with GE
3LS integration as faring better than that of their own countries. International reviewers saw GE
3LS integration "as a key defining characteristic of Genome Canada and very valuable".