You are here

Building a GE3LS Architecture (GE3LS Arc)

Status: 
Past
Competition: 
Competition III
Sector: 
Fisheries and Aquaculture
Forestry
Health
Genome Centre(s):
Genome British Columbia
Project Leader(s):
Michael Burgess (University of British Columbia), Peter Danielson (University of British Columbia)
Fiscal Year Project Launched: 
2005-2006
Project Description: 

This is a GE3LS stand-alone project.

Genomics opens up a universe of new possibilities, but also raises many ethical issues. For example, how can ethical judgments be made on genomic knowledge and applications when there is no single accepted ethical theory to determine right and wrong? How can claims about the economic, environmental, social or health effects of genomics be evaluated against competing claims and alternatives? These are important issues, given Canada’s cultural and regional diversity, and the way new genomic knowledge and applications tend to move societal debates to new territory.

Michael M. Burgess holds the Chair in Biomedical Ethics at the University of British Columbia’s W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, and Peter Danielson is Mary and Maurice Young Professor of Applied Ethics and the Director of the same Centre. They are project leaders of Building a GE3LS Architecture or “GE3 LS Arc”.

GE3LS Arc will focus in three primary areas of genome research: salmon genomics, privacy and use of data banks and blood or tissue sample biobanks in health research and forestry genomics.

Building on a previously funded project, Democracy, Ethics and Genomics: Consultation, Deliberation and Modeling, GE3LS Arc will use consultation methods and computer-mediated technologies to develop an understanding of how people make decisions and their perspectives related to genomics research and biotechnology related to human health, food and the environment. The project will address three questions: What social norms do Canadians use to make judgments about genome research and applications (how do Canadians make moral decisions about a policy)? What are the leading moral perspectives on genomics (and what makes different judgments understandable)? And finally, what is the relevance for policy development and implementation (how are worldviews and norms incorporated into policy)?

The ultimate goal of the project is to support dialogue among scientists, policy makers and the public so that public concerns are truly reflected in policies related to genomics.